Prism Layer AML

Risk for the future of finance.

Good AML governance for banking, payments, and money movement, and new frameworks for the rails that didn't exist last cycle. When new markets and asset classes enter regulated finance, you build the methodology, controls, and reporting functions before the examiner asks.

SAR governanceSanctions & OFACTokens & digital assetsPrediction markets

The program

From everyday posture to rails that didn't exist last cycle.

The Methodology Layer

Develop, test, and refine AML methodologies for new threat vectors, then version them like software.

New Rails, New Frameworks

Frameworks, procedures, and controls for markets that didn't exist last cycle: tokens, digital assets, prediction markets.

SAR Governance & Reporting

Suspicious Activity Report governance, procedures, and reporting guidelines, built into the workflow.

Sanctions and OFAC

Office of Foreign Assets Control and sanctions screening coverage, assessed as first-class risk.

Everyday Posture

Banking, payments, and money movement, assessed at the speed financial crime now moves.

Same Governed Record

The governed workflow and assurance plane, expressed in financial-crime terms.

One assessment, on-chain to examiner

A prediction market operator, five risks, one signed record.

An illustrative AML assessment for a prediction market operator: five risks scored, ten controls evaluated, each residual measured against the appetite you set. This is the shape of what Prism Layer hands a committee, in minutes.

Escalated · Key decisions required
5Risks assessed
10Controls evaluated
2Residual above target
~9mEngagement
R1Wallet KYC & customer risk rating
−45%
Conservative · 1.5–2.0Within target
R2Structuring across token rails
−42%
Conservative · 1.5–2.0Within target
R3Cross-venue market concentration
−48%
Balanced · 2.5Within target
R4SAR backlog & case aging
−40%
Conservative · 1.5–2.0One band above
R5On-chain sanctions screening dependency
−50%
Averse · 1.0One band above
ΔCost to Carry
R4 + R5, projected to the exam
Carry · on current controlsFindings likely
Deploy · remediation fundedClosed pre-exam
Supervisory exposureDecision pending

Path A · Deploy

Fund the Remediation Now

Commit targeted capital against the two risks sitting above appetite, closing the gap before the exam cycle. Higher outlay, findings retired.

Path B · Carry

Hold and Monitor

Run on current controls and accept supervisory exposure if they slip under examination. Budget preserved, the findings stay live.

Signed recordTR-2A9F-4C21Hash 6dad…8203Reasoning · claude mythosConfidence 92%Committed 09:26 UTC

The exam file

Your report, print-ready for the examiner.

Export the signed assessment to a paginated PDF for your committee, board, examiners, or regulators. Cover to signature, on Letter or A4, with a repeating header and footer.

Eight sections, then four appendices: the full reasoning passes, control detail, the run log and document manifest, and a signature page with the hash fingerprint.

Prism Layer · Signed Assessment

Prediction Market AML & Sanctions Risk Assessment

Committed · REC-2A9F-4C21 · Confidence 92%

Executive summary01
Scope & operating model02
Risk register03
Baseline heatmap04
Controls & mitigation05
Residual risk06
Target alignment07
Escalation & recommended action08
Signed · Hash 4f9c…a210 · 4 appendices attached

The assurance plane

Every acceleration runs inside a control the examiner can read.

Identity Permissions Task scope Guardrails Validation Approval Audit capture

Role-based identity, least-privilege retrieval, bounded task scope, policy guardrails, evidence-linked reasoning, expert approval, immutable capture. Every output links back to policy context, source evidence, and reviewer action.

Three data layers

Grounded in FFIEC, FinCEN, your history, and your live systems.

Industry Frameworks

The FFIEC BSA/AML manual, FinCEN guidance, OFAC sanctions programs, and FATF recommendations, kept current so you don't have to.

Your Internal Data

Policies, prior exams, independent testing, lookbacks, and your typology library. The system is trained on you.

Live Integrations

Transaction monitoring, screening, case management, and core systems, read in place.

Confidence scoring

See exactly how much of every output rests on your data versus industry defaults. Internal documents raise confidence, so you always know what's grounded in your program and what's a framework starting point.

Observable reasoning

Every filing decision, replayable to its source.

A specialized agent runs each step and shows its work. You keep the judgment. The system keeps the record.

A Reasoning Agent per Step

Scope, baseline, residual-risk, and target agents run each step and name the reasoning behind every call.

Confidence Scoring

Every output shows how much rests on your data versus industry defaults. Add a foundation document to raise confidence, up to 20%.

Deterministic Where It Counts

Residual risk is computed deterministically from confirmed baselines and controls. No black box on the math.

Appetite Bands & Alignment

Target bands from averse to opportunistic. Scenarios over appetite surface an alignment status and a governance response.

Full Provenance

Reasoning, references, execution trace, and decision trace on every output. Replay any conclusion.

Signed & Exportable

Formal sign-off with a hash fingerprint, and a report you can export for the committee.

Risk appetite bands

AverseConservativeBalancedProgressiveOpportunistic

Right-sized for your world

Where money moves, the record has to hold.

A sample of where Prism Layer AML is right-sized, not the limit.

Financial Services & Fintech

BankingBaaSPaymentsMoney movementLending & creditBrokerageRetail investingNeobanksChallenger banksCryptoDigital assetsPrediction marketsExchangesMarket infrastructureClearingInsuranceInsurTechAsset managementWealthRegTechComplianceEmployee benefitsRetirement

High-Exposure Adjacents

GamingBettingMarketplacesE-commerceReal estateTraveland many more

Who's at the table

Financial crime has a full bench of owners.

Prism Layer AML briefs every owner of financial-crime risk, in the terms each seat works in.

CLO

Filing decisions and program changes carry defensible reasoning linked to policy.

Head of Financial Crime

Owns the program across banking, payments, and digital assets. The methodology runs in their language.

BSA/AML Officer

SAR governance, procedures, and reporting guidelines, built into the workflow.

Transaction Monitoring

Structuring, layering, and rapid movement mapped to evidence across every rail.

Markets & Exchange Compliance

Tokens, listings, and prediction markets assessed as first-class financial-crime risk.

Partner & Portfolio Operations

BaaS and fintech programs aggregated cross-partner, so concentration is visible early.

One engine underneath

Same governed engine. Same signed record.

See the architecture →

Defensible by design

See it run on a financial-crime scenario.

On a use case from your world. Nothing required in advance.