Prism Layer CISO

Security risk for the AI era.

Threat vectors now move at machine speed, and the tools you deploy to keep up are themselves nondeterministic. Prism Layer CISO assesses both sides: the AI you defend against and the AI you defend with, on frameworks your auditor recognizes, at the tempo national security work demands.

Shadow AINIST & ISO 27001Threat tempoYour models, your keys

The perimeter

What the CISO defends, Prism Layer assesses.

AI Governance

Shadow AI, model bias, data poisoning, and drift, assessed as first-class risk where deterministic controls don't fit.

Control Frameworks

Assessed against recognized frameworks like ISO 27001, SOC 2, and NIST, not a general taxonomy.

Threat Vectors at AI Speed

Adversaries automate. Your assessment tempo matches: posture re-assessed in minutes when the threat picture shifts, not next quarter.

Threat and Control Mapping

Threats mapped to controls, with gaps and compensating controls surfaced.

Mission & National Security

Operational resilience for missions that cannot fail: defense, intelligence, and critical-infrastructure postures held to the strictest appetite.

Your Models, Your Keys

LLM-agnostic and run on your own model keys, so nothing leaves your control by default.

One assessment, model to mission

An AI governance review, five risks, one signed record.

An illustrative AI governance assessment: five risks scored, ten controls evaluated, each residual measured against the appetite you set. This is the shape of what Prism Layer hands a committee, in minutes.

Escalated · Key decisions required
5Risks assessed
10Controls evaluated
2Residual above target
~6mEngagement
R1Shadow AI & model inventory
−45%
Conservative · 1.5–2.0Within target
R2Prompt injection & agent guardrails
−42%
Conservative · 1.5–2.0Within target
R3Third-party model & API dependencies
−48%
Balanced · 2.5Within target
R4Model drift & data poisoning
−40%
Conservative · 1.5–2.0One band above
R5Single foundation-model dependency
−50%
Averse · 1.0One band above
ΔCost to Carry
R4 + R5, projected to the audit
Carry · on current controlsFindings likely
Deploy · controls fundedClosed pre-audit
Control-gap exposureDecision pending

Path A · Deploy

Fund the Mitigation Now

Commit targeted capital against the two risks sitting above appetite, closing the gap before the audit. Higher outlay, exposure retired.

Path B · Carry

Hold and Monitor

Run on current controls and accept the control-gap exposure if threats land. Budget preserved, the risk stays live.

Signed recordTR-7A21-C0B4Hash 6dad…8203Reasoning · claude mythosConfidence 88%Committed 18:47 UTC

The audit file

Your report, print-ready for the auditor.

Export the signed assessment to a paginated PDF for your committee, board, auditors, or customer security reviews. Cover to signature, on Letter or A4, with a repeating header and footer.

Eight sections, then four appendices: the full reasoning passes, control detail, the run log and document manifest, and a signature page with the hash fingerprint.

Prism Layer · Signed Assessment

Information Security & AI Governance Risk Assessment

Committed · REC-7A21-C0B4 · Confidence 88%

Executive summary01
Scope & operating model02
Risk register03
Baseline heatmap04
Controls & mitigation05
Residual risk06
Target alignment07
Escalation & recommended action08
Signed · Hash 4f9c…a210 · 4 appendices attached

The assurance plane

Every acceleration runs inside a control you can attest to.

Identity Permissions Task scope Guardrails Validation Approval Audit capture

Role-based identity, least-privilege retrieval, bounded task scope, policy guardrails, evidence-linked reasoning, expert approval, immutable capture. Every output links back to policy context, source evidence, and reviewer action.

Three data layers

Grounded in NIST, ISO 27001, your history, and your live telemetry.

Industry Frameworks

ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIST CSF and AI RMF, and CIS benchmarks, kept current so you don't have to.

Your Internal Data

Policies, SCTMs, pen-test results, audit evidence, and your asset inventory. The system is trained on you.

Live Integrations

SIEM, vulnerability scanners, identity providers, and cloud posture tools, read in place.

Confidence scoring

See exactly how much of every output rests on your data versus industry defaults. Internal documents raise confidence, so you always know what's grounded in your program and what's a framework starting point.

Observable reasoning

Every control claim, replayable to its source.

A specialized agent runs each step and shows its work. You keep the judgment. The system keeps the record.

A Reasoning Agent per Step

Scope, baseline, residual-risk, and target agents run each step and name the reasoning behind every call.

Confidence Scoring

Every output shows how much rests on your data versus industry defaults. Add a foundation document to raise confidence, up to 20%.

Deterministic Where It Counts

Residual risk is computed deterministically from confirmed baselines and controls. No black box on the math.

Appetite Bands & Alignment

Target bands from averse to opportunistic. Scenarios over appetite surface an alignment status and a governance response.

Full Provenance

Reasoning, references, execution trace, and decision trace on every output. Replay any conclusion.

Signed & Exportable

Formal sign-off with a hash fingerprint, and a report you can export for the committee.

Risk appetite bands

AverseConservativeBalancedProgressiveOpportunistic

Right-sized for your world

Where the attack surface grows, the record has to hold.

A sample of where Prism Layer CISO is right-sized, not the limit.

Enterprise Technology

AI platformsCloud platformsData infrastructureAnalyticsCybersecurityIdentitySemiconductorsNetworkingSaaSDeveloper platformsTelecomCommunications infrastructure

Defense, Government & Intelligence

DefenseDefense techGovernmentPublic sectorIntelligence communityCritical infrastructure

Data-Heavy Operators

HealthcareDigital healthBankingPaymentsEnergyUtilitiesand many more

Who's at the table

Security risk reaches every technology seat.

Prism Layer CISO briefs the security and technology table, in the terms each seat works in.

CISO

Owns the frameworks and the threat model. The engine reasons on their terms.

CIO

Enterprise systems and AI adoption assessed on one governed record, at rollout speed.

CTO

The AI you ship carries a defensible risk record before it reaches production.

Security Engineering

Controls mapped and evidenced instead of read line by line.

National Security & Mission Owners

Defense, intelligence, and critical-infrastructure postures held to the strictest appetite.

GRC & Compliance

SOC 2 and ISO evidence as a byproduct of doing the work.

One engine underneath

Same governed engine. Same signed record.

See the architecture →

Defensible by design

See it run on a security scenario.

On a use case from your world. Nothing required in advance.